IMMIGRATION UPDATES & NEWS
Immigration Judges Given Needed Discretion in Deportation of Employment-Based Visa Holders
Jan 25, 11:33 AM
All immigration practioners applaud a decision issued today by the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) in Matter of Neto, 25 I&N Dec. 169 (BIA 2010), which empowers immigration judges who are considering deportation of individuals with approved work-related visa petitions and pending permanent residence applications. The issue at stake is whether an immigration judge has the authority to decide whether the approved visa petition – issued for one job – remains valid when the individual changes jobs. Without a valid visa petition, the individual will not be eligible for permanent residence.
In 2000, Congress passed the American Competitiveness in the Twenty-First Century Act, which allowed applicants for permanent residence based on approved visa petitions the flexibility to change jobs. However, in 2005, the BIA decided in Matter of Perez-Vargas 23 I&N Dec. 829 (BIA 2005), that an immigration judge had no authority to decide under INA § 204(j), whether a new job was the same as or similar to the old job, which determines validity of their visa petition. This left these applicants for permanent residence in limbo, stripping them of the ability to benefit from the 2000 law while in removal proceedings because the judges couldn’t, and the United States Citizenship and Immigration Service wouldn’t, determine the validity of their visa petition.
Last week, in Matter of Neto, the BIA overruled its own earlier decision that denied judges this authority and will now allow them to decide whether a new job is acceptable, thus keeping the individual’s eligibility for permanent residence intact. In which case, the visa petition remains valid and the immigrant worker can proceed with an application to become a lawful permanent resident – potentially saving them from deportation.
The American Immigration Counsel, Legal Action Center filed an amicus brief in support of the applicant for permanent residence in the case. “Today’s decision will impact hundreds if not thousands of individuals in removal proceedings and will ensure that they have a full and fair opportunity to demonstrate to an immigration judge that they are eligible to become legal permanent residents” said Mary Kenney, attorney with the American Immigration Council’s Legal Action Center.
The immigration law firm of Haitham Edward Ballout & Associates represents clients throughout the United States and California, Ca, Bay Area, Northern Ca, Southern California, San Francisco and San Francisco County, Marin County, San Rafael, Sausalito, San Anselmo, Ross, Mill Valley, San Mateo County including San Mateo, Millbrae, San Bruno, South San Francisco, Burlingame, Pacifica, Daly City, Brisbane, Half Moon Bay, Hillsborough, Atherton, San Carlos, Belmont, Redwood City, Foster City, Redwood Shores, Sonoma County, Solano County, Napa County, Alameda County, Oakland, Berkeley, Hayward, Pleasanton, Livermore, Castro Valley, Fremont, Contra Costa County, Richmond, El Cerrito, Pinole, Martinez, Concord, Walnut Creek, Santa Clara County, Palo Alto, Mountain View, Mt. View, Silicon Valley, South Bay, San Jose, Campbell, Los Altos, Los Gatos, Sunnyvale, Gilroy, Monterey County, Santa Cruz, Salinas, Watsonville, Carmel. Beyond California, many clients come to us from surrounding states including Oregon, Washington, Nevada, and Arizona and beyond the borders of the United States.